francis
C.O.G.
Posts: 2,483
My main instrument is: Whatever I'm building...
|
Post by francis on May 19, 2016 8:40:55 GMT
You're very brave Rob slotting the bridge for the saddle pieces so early. I now build and finish the guitar, string it up and find the intonation points for each string, then cut the saddle slots. I found that with my maple guitars I can use a single piece saddle, my rosewood guitars need a two piece and the Amazique I just finished needed a 3 piece as the intonation point would not line up well enough to put them all on even a 1/8" wide bone saddle. Coming on well
|
|
ocarolan
Global Moderator
CURMUDGEONLY OLD GIT (leader - to join, just ask!)
Posts: 35,724
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"c0cfe1"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: 182a3f
Mini-Profile Text Color: 733a1c
|
Post by ocarolan on May 19, 2016 9:26:10 GMT
francis - Interesting, Francis. Not doubting your findings at all, but struggling to understand them! How do the strings know what the back/sides are made of? My simple brain tells me that the same string at the same length should intonate in the same way wherever it is? What am I missing here? Sorry Rob for this sidetrack! Keith
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 19, 2016 9:38:28 GMT
Sidetrack away, Keith! (I personally suspect that it is the fact that they are three different guitars rather than three different materials that makes the difference. Or maybe you've been using Smartstrings, Francis?!) francis. It's not brave at all, I'm afraid. First of all, I am free to move the nut position within a comparatively big range to change the overall length of the scale and, secondly, each of the slots accommodates a wooden "sub-saddle" (and you don't see those very often!) which allows considerable range of position - probably 2mm - for the bits of fret wire which slot into them to form the final saddle position. (It's a bit like the things they have on electrics).
|
|
ocarolan
Global Moderator
CURMUDGEONLY OLD GIT (leader - to join, just ask!)
Posts: 35,724
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"c0cfe1"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: 182a3f
Mini-Profile Text Color: 733a1c
|
Post by ocarolan on May 19, 2016 9:47:40 GMT
Sidetrack away, Keith! (I personally suspect that it is the fact that they are three different guitars rather than three different materials that makes the difference.)............ Thanks Rob - yes, I get what you're saying, and I realised that, so I probably didn't phrase my query too well, being out of my depth here! The amount of compensation at the saddle required for correct intonation might well vary by a fractional amount with differing scale lengths, string construction/gauge/tension, action etc, but that it should vary as much as Francis has found on some of his guitars is what puzzles me. What other factors might be coming into play here? K
|
|
francis
C.O.G.
Posts: 2,483
My main instrument is: Whatever I'm building...
|
Post by francis on May 19, 2016 10:57:56 GMT
francis - Interesting, Francis. Not doubting your findings at all, but struggling to understand them! How do the strings know what the back/sides are made of? My simple brain tells me that the same string at the same length should intonate in the same way wherever it is? What am I missing here? Sorry Rob for this sidetrack! Keith Keith, (Sorry Rob), All I can say is that it's happened consistently on 6 guitars (apart from the amazique as I've only built one with that). It could also be that in using a narrow range of timbers (i.e. Maple and E I Rosewood). The next guitar will be in cherry so see what happens then... Rob, That sounds complicated, very adjustable, but complicated. Does that put the saddle (read fret wire) quite high above the soundboard? What sort of break angle are you getting with that arrangement? Francis
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 19, 2016 11:58:46 GMT
About 152 or 28 degrees, whichever way you look at it. The height is also, of course, adjustable to some extend depending on the height of each removable sub-saddle: All my secrets divulged in the name of luthiery!
|
|
francis
C.O.G.
Posts: 2,483
My main instrument is: Whatever I'm building...
|
Post by francis on May 19, 2016 12:28:03 GMT
From your sketch Rob does that mean the ball end of the string is in contact with the soundboard? (side elevation)
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 19, 2016 12:43:19 GMT
Yep (and trying hard to rip the bridge off the soundboard).
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 19, 2016 18:49:21 GMT
From your sketch Rob does that mean the ball end of the string is in contact with the soundboard? (side elevation) Sketch!!! That's a precise meticulous scale drawing that is!!!!
|
|
francis
C.O.G.
Posts: 2,483
My main instrument is: Whatever I'm building...
|
Post by francis on May 19, 2016 20:19:47 GMT
From your sketch Rob does that mean the ball end of the string is in contact with the soundboard? (side elevation) Sketch!!! That's a preicise meticulous scale drawing that is!!!! Of course it is - silly me, just working out whether it's first or third angle projection certainly not orthographic...
|
|
|
Post by andy3sheds on May 19, 2016 20:46:32 GMT
As shown in the drawing surely the ball end over time will break through the top with routine string changing. Isn't this cause for concern?
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 19, 2016 20:54:52 GMT
I can understand that this may be a bridge-thread too far for some of you but I've started so I'll finish. That's two cliches already. It was too straight across the top, if you remember, and would need to be curved slightly to line up with the curvature of the fingerboard. I drew some hatching on the offending area thus: took my home-made 16-inch radius block in my hand: and "went for it" as we say nowadays: Checked the curve with my bit of curvy metal: and then smoothed off all the curves to where they wanted to be (and got it down under 20g): whilst cunningly keeping the fissure which is visible around the line of the top e-string. It's not visible on the bottom and, since the whole thing will be glued and pinned down, I'll think I'll just leave it as it is and repair it if I need to - after all, this guitar is a bit of a test-bed if truth be told. Now the top is not far off polished - I sanded it and polished it again this morning - so I thought it would be best to get at least some of the polish on the bridge before sticking it down. Besides, I wanted to see what colour it would be with a bit of polish on it. So here's the answer: Yes, I know; it is a bit acrid greenish but that might look okay in context. You can't really tell until it's there in situ. (I have the same problem with planning decorating schemes for bedrooms and sitting-rooms but that's by the by). Anyway, the answer will have to wait till tomorrow because at the moment I don't want to disturb it since it is well and truly double-sided to a piece of plywood and the polish is way too soft to have cramps applying pressure to it. Which thought brought me to the caul which I had, as yet, not made up. So I made it up: and now I'm just about ready to glue the bridge in place. I know I will damage the polish to some extent with the cramping, but it's better to have something on it rather than try to start from scratch without touching the surrounding surface. Well, there you are then; there was a boredom warning at the outset so I only feel slightly guilty about this evening's offering.
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 19, 2016 21:03:19 GMT
As shown in the drawing surely the ball end over time will break through the top with routine string changing. Isn't this cause for concern? You may be right but I don't get the impression from the others that I've made like this that it's likely to happen. The pull is at a fairly low angle along the soundboard and, as such, is trying to slide the bridge along the surface towards the sound-hole. The grain of the wood in the bridge is orientated north-south so there's no chance of it lifting and splitting the wood unless it can snap it across the grain and that's unlikely. Laburnum seems pretty tough to me and it's not as if the ball end is being hit against it again and again; it just nestles in there. Also there's a good 6 or 7mm thickness here and it's reinforced by being glued to the soundboard and dowelled through to the braces underneath. There is a chance but I would be less surprised to see the whole bridge fly across the room!
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 20, 2016 19:25:26 GMT
Had to go to town (Cambridge) today - dentist and sourdough-starter amongst other things - so didn't get an awful lot done because I have to use the bus and it all takes a little while. What I did do is again a little bridgey but we should be moving on to more exciting stuff soon. Started by peeling the tape off the soundboard: Now this may look like a nice clean job but, as others have probably discovered before me, the theoretical shape of the bridge is not absolutely precisely to within 0.5mm what you end up with especially when you have a funny curvy shape rather than lots of straight lines. This means that my bridge doesn't exactly fit the footprint and needed a bit of modification and will need a bit of tidying up with polish after it's attached. I have learned a lesson and will revert to scribing and scraping from now on. Anyway, I taped my caul to the back of the soundboard and cut a piece of oak slightly smaller than the bridge. This I heated on both sides with an iron until it was jolly hot and then placed it between the bridge and the soundboard to warm things up ready for the hot hide glue: Last time I used a hot air gun and managed to blast the finish off the soundboard and also warped the bridge itself with too much heat so at least I learned those lessons. This time it resulted in a very calm and controlled warming up of the relevant surfaces ready to receive the glue: As you will observe, I used 2 homemade - I believe the correct term is "shop-made" actually - long-reach cramps - they're elm if you're interested - to fix the bridge down. This was a simple enough set-up to allow me to slide it around till I was happy with the positioning. Let's hope it still looks good in the morning. Next up is to make the fingerboard after I have put all the pegs through the bridge - but I can't see myself not trying a bit of tapping and voicing now that the braces have all been locked in by the bridge. (I'll try to look thoughtful when I'm doing it). It really is a finished soundboard that I'll be listening to so it should provide the best chance I've ever had to get it right. Still not entirely confident that I know what "right" sounds like, however.
|
|
R the F
Luthier / Guitar Maker
Posts: 1,135
My main instrument is: bandsaw
|
Post by R the F on May 21, 2016 8:52:47 GMT
Straight to the workshop this morning before all chores to see the results of last night's cramping up. Here's how it looks: A bit scruffy round the edges and, as I mentioned, the polish will need a little sorting because of the cramps on the bridge surface and the tape on the soundboard... but that's the beauty of french polishing, fairly easily sorted: There's definitely a very different feel to the soundboard suddenly as I was hoping there would be. The theory seems to have come good so far; the board has a much more stable feel now. Should have recorded the tap tone before and after really. (More practically speaking, I've also realised I should have drilled through for the dowel holes before shaping the braces at all and also into the bridge blank before starting any work on it just to get everything very set in place from the start. Note to self for next time.)
|
|